The author cites historical precedents beyond the realm of film, such as the state authorising the seizures of pornographic books from reputable publishers First of the Small Nations Gerard Keown. What’s Wrong with the British Constitution? Skip to main content. Petley argues that the creation of this rating was a direct result of the influential Report of the Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship, also known as the Williams Committee, and which was subsequently thrown out by the Thatcher government as unacceptably liberal. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. But what may be more surprising is that depictions of sex were hardly spared either.
Contagious Communities Roberta Bivins. Seduced by the Familiar M. The author cites historical precedents beyond the realm of film, such as the state authorising the seizures of pornographic books from reputable publishers First of the Small Nations Gerard Keown. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Starting in , the birth of the domestic video industry – and the first year of the Thatcher government – this critical study explains how the censorship of films both in cinemas and on video and DVD has developed in Britain.
Why does it exist? Choose your country or region Close.
Film and Video Censorship in Modern Britain – Hardcover – Julian Petley – Oxford University Press
But according to Petley this is far from an unintended consequence for regulators; after all, the BBFC has no need further to censure what is already considered unacceptably taboo by a complacent and passive society at large. But another, potentially more revealing interpretation by modern readers may be that Milton and Orwell were fighting against a system whose ptley of control was far more expansive — and therefore rarely subjected to letley scrutiny — than any other developed nation in the Western world.
A Nasty Story 2. For Petley, the problem exists almost entirely from a standpoint of policy, and namely, in the Video Recordings Act. The Report was deceptively used by the government as a justification for segregating sexually explicit material from the videp public.
This is thought to be the precise opposite of content regulations everywhere else in the world, including Great Britain, where depictions of violence are far more problematic and heavily-censored. The Limits of the Possible Cinema, Censorship, and Sexuality, Zach Saltz1 Anglophiles and English professors have routinely given inordinate praise to the long-standing tendency in British literature firmly to reject attempts at enforcing state-sponsored censorship.
Contagious Communities Roberta Bivins.
Published by Edinburgh Pehley Press. Indeed, a great deal of attention is paid to news stories hyped for broader public consumption in the Evening Standard and the Daily Mail anc, characterised as fruitless accomplices to the Thatcher regime, did little except to initiate further campaigns against movie studios for distributing product with corrosive side effects on the viewing culture.
But it is not in these culturally mediated prescriptions of taste and decency that Petley vido the most problems. Such potent rhetoric and consequences from the BBFC appear to belie the conventional notion that the bark of the censor is worse than its bite, but in a culture where year olds are more familiar with Jackass than Oliver Twist, such hysterical measures seem undeniably impossible to completely impose, even if minors are led censorshio believe that all depictions of sex and violence are irrefutably wrong.
The author cites historical precedents beyond the realm of film, such as the state authorising the seizures of pornographic books from reputable publishers Skip to main content. This is an uncannily applicable idea for a society where minors can routinely upload violent prtley pornographic content at the click of a mouse; why not foster a culture where children act as self-regulators of objectionable content?
By the end of the decade, there were onlyVCRs available in the country a decade later, that figure would swell to nearly 14 million. How does film and video censorship operate in Britain?
In alone, seven and a half hours of hulian activity were cut from videos Log In Sign Up. Academic Skip to main content.
Film and Video Censorship in Modern Britain
These range from laws such as the Video Recordings Act and Obscene Publications Act, and how these are enforced by the police and Crown Prosecution Service and interpreted by the courts, to government policy on matters such as pornography.
Projections of Memory Richard I. Click here to sign up.
Film and Video Censorship in Modern Britain does not stray from this widely accepted claim. As well as presenting a detailed analysis of the workings of the British Board of Film Classification, Petley casts his gaze well beyond the BBFC to analyse the forces which the Board has to take into account when classifying and censoring.
His book is not an encyclopedic attempt to chart and examine landmark films setting BBFC precedent, nor is his prose riddled with suspicion or personal upheaval pwtley the effects of the BBFC, as seen in a vast deal of less introspective texts — popular and academic — jhlian the American motion picture rating system.
The price of a videocassette, for rental or purchase, was also prohibitive to the middle and lower economic classes In Augusta series of bizarre events revealed that the Act had never been properly passed in the first place, some 26 years earlier.
Starting inthe birth of the domestic video industry – and the first year of the Thatcher government – this critical study explains how the censorship of films both in cinemas and on video and DVD has developed in Britain. Remember me on this computer.
Petley observes that, perhaps as an ironic intellectual counter to the claims of Milton and Orwell, the BBFC is fond of quoting John Stuart Mill in justifying its prolonged existence: Petley argues that the BBFC, although undeniably stringent in its policing of obscene content, is only a product of overarching cultural practices and attitudes, suggesting a broader ideological shift that has taken place in British society over the last several decades. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
Julian Petley, “Film and Video Censorship in Modern Britain” () | Zach Saltz –
Petley argues that the creation of julan rating was a direct result of the influential Report of the Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship, also known as the Williams Committee, and which was subsequently thrown out by the Thatcher government vieo unacceptably liberal. What is more disturbing for the author is the conclusion that the British government has repeatedly shown unwillingness to curb any portion of the enormous power bestowed on the BBFC through passage of the VRA.
Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. Henri-Georges Clouzot Christopher Lloyd. Petley connects the gradual rise of censorial action with the slow growth of video in Great Britain, beginning in the s. One of the best-known claims surrounding modern film censorship is that, in the United States, sexual content is considered unequivocally taboo and subject to harsher regulations than violence. First of the Small Nations Gerard Cnesorship.